STARTUP LEGAL2 Sept 2026
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
A consumer court rejected a revision petition because it came 747 days late and offered no proper explanation. Earlier, the petitioner’s lawyer said he would deposit Rs 3 lakh, but that deposit never happened. So the court refused to disturb the lower forums’ orders. For business owners: delays and broken promises in legal cases are costly. Act immediately on court orders and meet every deadline.
Key Statutory Highlights
- The revision petition was rejected after an inordinate delay of 747 days with no proper explanation.
- The petitioner’s counsel offered to deposit Rs 3,00,000, but no deposit was made.
- The court found no reason to interfere with the orders passed by the lower forums.
Actionable Advice for Taxpayers / Founders:If you have a pending case, do not delay filings or ignore an undertaking made to the court. File in time and deposit any promised amount before the next date; courts may not give another chance.
Statutory Disclaimer: TaxQue Shorts are AI-assisted editorial briefs for compliance awareness. This brief has not passed every source check; confirm the original notification before acting. This does not constitute formal legal or CA counsel.
TaxQue News Desk
Share: